Today (after
understanding the concepts of learning theories), it is now clear to me that
teaching and learning are the two opposite sides of the coin, where for every
toss, there must be learning (head) and teaching (tail). The two can never be
separated from each other and achieving both is a must, the question is now the
how part of it.
This is a simple question
because in this case my role and the role of the instructional activities in such
a world of constructivist classroom would be to present an inspiring and
stimulating condition in the classroom that tasks students into problems that
are solvable by the students themselves.
In this particular case, the student‘s activity and responses are taken
to be rational and meaningful to themselves, no matter how strange they may appear/sound
to others, it is upon me to determine the rationality and meaning of such
responses.
In all these (described
above), it shows how I have positive feelings about the theories’ integration into
the class room simply because it takes: (i) learning to be a process that depends
on the prior ideas the learner brings to the knowledge; (ii) that the learner must
construct his/her own meaning to concepts (iii) that it is all about sharing
and negotiating a common understanding of a situation.
Conclusively, I would
rather invest greater time and make greater emphasis on ‘learning how to learn’
than gathering facts in terms of content for the learners.
Mustafa, I also agree that less time should be spent on giving content to the learners so that they can look for it themselves.
ReplyDeleteThanks Mundu. If you have children try some of these approaches with them too. If they are good for your learners, how can they be poisonous to your biological children.
ReplyDeleteI agree that learners should be in control of their own learning and as teachers we should refrain from pumping them with knowledge.
ReplyDelete